In-depth checks apps

Detailed results of the in-depth checks of the reviewed apps

In 2022, a total of around 280 accessibility screens were checked for the 17 in-depth checks of apps. In 2023, there were around 200 screens for 15 in-depth checks of apps and in 2025 around 230 screens were checked for 15 in-depth checks of apps.

Detailed information on the procedure is described under Methodological details.

Shares Compliance status of all in-depth checked apps

Monitoring period

For each app, 120 criteria were checked. The app with the least unfulfilled criteria does not meet 9 criteria. 10 apps (just under 60% of apps) do not meet 10 to 20 criteria. 6 apps (around 35%) do not meet more than 20 criteria. The apps with the most unfulfilled criteria don't meet 35 criteria. This means that all in-depth checked apps are partially compatible with accessibility requirements – they meet at least 50% of the checked criteria, but less than 100%.
If only WCAG is considered and the other criteria from EN 301 549 are not included in the calculation, the proportions are as follows (conformity with WCAG):

Fully compatible (100% of WCAG criteria met): 0% (no checked app)
Partially compatible (atleast (at least)50% of WCAG criteria met): 94% of apps checked
Not compatible (below 50% of WCAG criteria met): A Checked App

For the calculations, valuations with "not applicable" were attributed to valuations with "fulfilled".

For each app, 120 criteria were checked. The app with the least unfulfilled criteria does not meet 10 criteria. 9 apps (60% of apps) do not meet 10 to 20 criteria. 6 apps (40%) do not meet more than 20 criteria. The app with the most unfulfilled criteria does not meet 28 criteria. This means that all in-depth checked apps are partially compatible with accessibility requirements – they meet at least 50% of the checked criteria, but less than 100%.
If only WCAG is considered and the other criteria from EN 301 549 are not included in the calculation, the proportions are as follows (conformity with WCAG):

Fully compatible (100% of WCAG criteria met): 0% (no checked app)

Partially compatible (atleast (at least)50% of WCAG criteria met): 100% of apps checked

Not compatible (below 50% of WCAG criteria met): No Checked App

For the calculations, valuations with "not applicable" were attributed to valuations with "fulfilled".

For each app, 120 criteria were checked. The app with the least unfulfilled criteria does not meet 14 criteria. 6 apps (40% of apps) do not meet up to 20 criteria. 9 apps (60%) do not meet more than 20 criteria. The app with the most unfulfilled criteria does not meet 42 criteria. This means that all in-depth checked apps are partially compatible with accessibility requirements – they meet at least 50% of the checked criteria, but less than 100%.
If only WCAG is considered and the other criteria from EN 301 549 are not included in the calculation, the proportions are as follows (conformity with WCAG):

Fully compatible (100% of WCAG criteria met): 0% (no checked app)
Partially compatible (atleast (at least)50% of WCAG criteria met): 87% of apps checked
Not compatible (below 50% of WCAG criteria met): 13% of apps checked

For the calculations, valuations with "not applicable" were attributed to valuations with "fulfilled".

Monitoring result by number of WCAG criteria not met

Monitoring period

For the in-depth checks of the apps, 45 WCAG criteria were checked. No app meets all the criteria. The app with the least unfulfilled criteria does not meet 9 criteria. About three-quarters of apps don't meet 11 to 15 criteria. The app with the most unfulfilled criteria does not meet 23 criteria. On average, the apps did not meet 14 criteria.

Table: Monitoring result by number of WCAG criteria not met in 2024

Number of criteria not met	Percentage of apps
0 to 5	0 %
6 to 10	6 %
11 to 15	76 %
16 to 20	12 %
21 to 25	6 %
26 to 30	0 %
31 to 35	0 %
36 to 40	0 %
41 to 45	0 %

For the in-depth checks of the apps, 45 WCAG criteria were checked. No app meets all the criteria. The app with the least unfulfilled criteria does not meet 7 criteria. One third of the apps do not meet 6 to 10, 11 to 15 or 16 to 20 criteria. The app with the most unfulfilled criteria does not meet 19 criteria. On average, the apps did not meet 13 criteria.

Table: Monitoring result by number of WCAG criteria not met 2023

Number of criteria not met	Percentage of apps
0 to 5	0 %
6 to 10	33 %
11 to 15	33 %
16 to 20	33 %
21 to 25	0 %
26 to 30	0 %
31 to 35	0 %
36 to 40	0 %
41 to 45	0 %

For the in-depth checks of the apps, 45 WCAG criteria were checked. No app meets all the criteria. The app with the least unfulfilled criteria does not meet 9 criteria. About 70% of apps don't meet 11 to 20 criteria. The app with the most unfulfilled criteria does not meet 25 criteria. On average, the apps did not meet 15 criteria.

Säulendiagramm Monitoringergebnis nach Anzahl nicht erfüllter WCAG-Kriterien 2024, siehe gleichnamige Tabelle darunter

Table: Monitoring result by number of WCAG criteria not met in 2024

Number of criteria not met	Percentage of apps
0 bis 5	0 %
6 bis 10	13 %
11 bis 15	40 %
16 bis 20	33 %
21 bis 25	13 %
26 bis 30	0 %
31 bis 35	0 %
36 bis 40	0 %
41 bis 45	0 %

Monitoring results according to principles

For the in-depth checks of the apps, 45 WCAG criteria were checked. The results are summarized according to the 4 principles of accessibility: "Perceptible", "Operable", "Understandable" and "Robust".

Perceivable

Monitoring period

No errors were found for 4 of the 19 "perceivable" criteria checked: "1.4.2 Audio Control", "1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)", "1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus" and "1.4.12 Text Spacing". The first two criteria
It was not applicable to any of the apps.

4 criteria were not met by only one app at a time: "1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)", "1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)", "1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)" and "1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose".

One criterion was not met by any of the checked apps: "1.3.1 Info and Relationships". Two other criteria were not met by over 90% of the apps: "1.1.1 Non-text Content" and "1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)".

Table: Perceivable 2022

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
1.4.2 Audio Control	0 %	0 %	100 %
1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)	0 %	0 %	100 %
1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus	0 %	35 %	65 %
1.4.12 Text Spacing	0 %	59 %	41 %
1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)	6 %	0 %	94 %
1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)	6 %	0 %	94 %
1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)	6 %	0 %	94 %
1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose	6 %	53 %	41 %
1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics	18 %	35 %	47 %
1.4.5 Images of Text	24 %	59 %	18 %
1.4.10 Reflow	35 %	65 %	0 %
1.4.11 Non-text Contrast	53 %	47 %	0 %
1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence	53 %	47 %	0 %
1.4.1 Use of Color	59 %	35 %	6 %
1.4.4 Resize text	71 %	29 %	0 %
1.3.4 Orientation	76 %	24 %	0 %
1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)	94 %	6 %	0 %
1.1.1 Non-text Content	94 %	6 %	0 %
1.3.1 Info and Relationships	100 %	0 %	0 %

No errors were found for 4 of the 19 "perceptible" criteria checked: "1.4.2 Audio Control", "1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)", "1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus" and "1.4.12 Text Spacing". However, the first two criteria were not applicable to any of the apps.

Three criteria were not met by only one app at a time: "1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)", "1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)" and "1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)".

One criterion was not met by any of the checked apps: "1.3.1 Info and Relationships". Another criterion – "1.1.1 Non-text Content" – was not met by more than 90% of the apps.

Table: Perceivable 2023

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
1.4.2 Audio Control	0 %	0 %	100 %
1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)	0 %	0 %	100 %
1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus	0 %	13 %	87 %
1.4.12 Text Spacing	0 %	7 %	93 %
1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)	7 %	0 %	93 %
1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)	7 %	0 %	93 %
1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)	7 %	0 %	93 %
1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics	13 %	13 %	73 %
1.4.10 Reflow	13 %	87 %	0 %
1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose	27 %	13 %	60 %
1.4.5 Images of Text	33 %	33 %	33 %
1.4.11 Non-text Contrast	53 %	47 %	0 %
1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence	53 %	47 %	0 %
1.4.1 Use of Color	60 %	40 %	0 %
1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)	60 %	40 %	0 %
1.3.4 Orientation	73 %	27 %	0 %
1.1.1 Non-text Content	83 %	13 %	0 %
1.4.4 Resize text	93 %	7 %	0 %

One criterion was not met by only one app: "1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics".

Two criteria were not met by any of the checked apps: "1.3.1 Info and Relationships" and "1.1.1 Non-text Content".

Table: Perceivable 2024

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
1.4.2 Audio Control	0 %	7 %	93 %
1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)	0 %	7 %	93 %
1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus	0 %	13 %	87 %
1.4.12 Text Spacing	0 %	7 %	93 %
1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics	7 %	47 %	47 %
1.4.5 Images of Text	20 %	47 %	33 %
1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)	27 %	7 %	67 %
1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)	33 %	0 %	67 %
1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)	33 %	0 %	67 %
1.4.10 Reflow	33 %	67 %	0 %
1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose	47 %	27 %	27 %
1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence	47 %	53 %	0 %
1.4.1 Use of Color	60 %	40 %	0 %
1.3.4 Orientation	67 %	33 %	0 %
1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)	73 %	27 %	0 %
1.4.11 Non-text Contrast	80 %	20 %	0 %
1.4.4 Resize text	80 %	20 %	0 %
1.1.1 Non-text Content	100 %	0 %	0 %
1.3.1 Info and Relationships	100 %	0 %	0 %

Operable

Monitoring period

3 of the 15 checked criteria of the "operable" principle were met by all checked apps or were not applicable: "2.5.4 Motion Actuation", "2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold" and "2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts".

The two criteria "2.2.1 Timing Adjustable" and "2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap" were not met by only one app at a time.

"2.4.3 Focus Order" is the operable principle criterion that is most often not met – 88% of apps found errors. The criterion "2.4.2 Page Titled" was checked only for documents present in the apps.

Table: Operable 2022

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	Not tested
2.5.4 Motion Actuation	0 %	6 %	94 %	0 %
2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold	0 %	29 %	71 %	0 %
2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts	0 %	59 %	41 %	0 %
2.2.1 Timing Adjustable	6 %	6 %	88 %	0 %
2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap	6 %	82 %	12 %	0 %
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide	12 %	6 %	82 %	0 %
2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation	24 %	76 %	0 %	0 %
2.4.2 Page Titled	24 %	29 %	12 %	35 %
2.4.7 Focus Visible	35 %	59 %	6 %	0 %
2.5.1 Pointer Gestures	41 %	18 %	41 %	0 %
2.4.6 Headings and Labels	47 %	53 %	0 %	0 %
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)	47 %	47 %	6 %	0 %
2.1.1 Keyboard	47 %	53 %	0 %	0 %
2.5.3 Label in Name	53 %	47 %	0 %	0 %
2.4.3 Focus Order	88 %	12 %	0 %	0 %

4 of the 15 checked criteria of the operable principle were met by all checked apps or were not applicable: "2.5.4 Motion Actuation", "2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold", "2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts" and "2.2.1 Timing Adjustable".

The two criteria "2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation" and "2.5.3 Label in Name" were not met by only one app at a time.

Also in the case of "2.4.2 Page Titled", errors were only found in the context of an app – however, the criterion was only checked for the documents contained in the apps.

"2.4.3 Focus Order" and "2.1.1 Keyboard" are the "operable" criteria that are most often not met – 87% of apps found errors.

Table: Operable 2023

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	Not tested
2.5.4 Motion Actuation	0 %	7 %	93 %	0 %
2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts	0 %	47 %	53 %	0 %
2.2.1 Timing Adjustable	0 %	7 %	93 %	0 %
2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation	7 %	87 %	7 %	0 %
2.4.2 Page Titled	7 %	7 %	7 %	80 %
2.5.3 Label in Name	7 %	93 %	0 %	0 %
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide	13 %	7 %	80 %	0 %
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)	20 %	80 %	0 %	0 %
2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap	40 %	60 %	0 %	0 %
2.5.1 Pointer Gestures	40 %	33 %	27 %	0 %
2.4.6 Headings and Labels	47 %	53 %	0 %	0 %
2.4.7 Focus Visible	60 %	40 %	0 %	0 %
2.1.1 Keyboard	87 %	13 %	0 %	0 %
2.4.3 Focus Order	87 %	13 %	0 %	0 %

One of the 14 checked criteria of the operable principle was met by all checked apps or was not applicable: "2.5.4 Motion Actuation".

The two criteria "2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold" and "2.2.1 Timing Adjustable" were not met by only one app at a time.

"2.4.3 Focus Order", "2.1.1 Keyboard" and "2.4.7 Focus Visible" are the "operable" criteria that are most often not met – 73% of apps found errors.

Note: "2.4.2 Page Titled" was not checked for apps during this monitoring period as documents were not checked for any of the apps.

Table: Operable 2024

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
2.5.4 Motion Actuation	0 %	7 %	93 %
2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold	7 %	7 %	87 %
2.2.1 Timing Adjustable	7 %	7 %	87 %
2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts	13 %	47 %	40 %
2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation	13 %	80 %	7 %
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide	13 %	7 %	80 %
2.4.6 Headings and Labels	13 %	87 %	0 %
2.5.3 Label in Name	27 %	73 %	0 %
2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap	27 %	73 %	0 %
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)	53 %	47 %	0 %
2.5.1 Pointer Gestures	53 %	20 %	27 %
2.4.7 Focus Visible	73 %	27 %	0 %
2.1.1 Keyboard	73 %	27 %	0 %
2.4.3 Focus Order	73 %	27 %	0 %

Understandable

Monitoring period

One of the 8 checked criteria of the "understandable" principle was met by all apps or was not applicable: "3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)".

Two criteria were not met by almost half of the apps: "3.3.1 Error Identification" and "3.3.2 Labels or Instructions".

The criterion "3.1.2 Language of Parts" was checked only for the documents contained in the apps.

Table: Understandable 2022

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	Not tested
3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)	0 %	29 %	71 %	0 %
3.2.1 On Focus	12 %	88 %	0 %	0 %
3.2.2 On Input	18 %	76 %	6 %	0 %
3.1.2 Language of Parts	18 %	6 %	41 %	35 %
3.3.3 Error Suggestion	24 %	41 %	35 %	0 %
3.1.1 Language of Page	35 %	65 %	0 %	0 %
3.3.2 Labels or Instructions	47 %	47 %	6 %	0 %
3.3.1 Error Identification	47 %	24 %	29 %	0 %

One of the 8 checked criteria of the "understandable" principle was met by all apps or was not applicable: "3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)". No errors were also found for "3.1.2 Language of Parts", but the criterion was only checked for the documents contained in the apps.

The three criteria "3.2.1 On Focus", "3.1.1 Language of Page" and "3.3.1 Error Identification" were not met by only one app at a time.

"3.3.2 Labels or Instructions" is the criterion of the "understandable" principle, which is most often not met – 47% of apps found errors.

Table: Understandable 2023

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	Not tested
3.1.2 Language of Parts	0 %	7 %	13 %	80 %
3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)	0 %	33 %	67 %	0 %
3.2.1 On Focus	7 %	93 %	0 %	0 %
3.1.1 Language of Page	7 %	93 %	0 %	0 %
3.3.1 Error Identification	7 %	53 %	40 %	0 %
3.3.3 Error Suggestion	13 %	47 %	40 %	0 %
3.2.2 On Input	20 %	80 %	0 %	0 %
3.3.2 Labels or Instructions	47 %	53 %	0 %	0 %

One of the 7 checked criteria of the "understandable" principle was not met by an app: "3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)".

"3.3.2 Labels or Instructions" is the criterion of the "understandable" principle, which is most often not met – 47% of apps found errors.

Note: "3.1.2 Language of Parts" was not checked for apps during this monitoring period, as documents were not checked for any of the apps.

Table: Understandable 2024

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)	7 %	27 %	67 %
3.2.1 On Focus	13 %	87 %	0 %
3.3.3 Error Suggestion	20 %	60 %	20 %
3.2.2 On Input	27 %	73 %	0 %
3.1.1 Language of Page	33 %	67 %	0 %
3.3.1 Error Identification	33 %	47 %	20 %
3.3.2 Labels or Instructions	47 %	53 %	0 %

Robust

Monitoring period

The criterion "4.1.2 Name, Role, Value" was not met by any of the tested apps. None of the criteria associated with the "robust" principle is met by all the apps checked.

Table: Robust 2022

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
4.1.1 Parsing	12 %	71 %	18 %
4.1.3 Status Messages	41 %	24 %	35 %
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value	100 %	0 %	0 %

The criterion "4.1.2 Name, Role, Value" was not met by any of the tested apps.
No errors were found for "4.1.1 Parsing" or the criterion was not applicable.

Table: Robust 2023

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
4.1.1 Parsing	0 %	27 %	73 %
4.1.3 Status Messages	67 %	27 %	7 %
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value	100 %	0 %	0 %

The criterion "4.1.2 Name, Role, Value" was only met by one of the tested apps. "4.1.1 Parsing" was consistently assessed as fulfilled. The criterion was classified as obsolete in October 2023 for WCAG2.2, deleted there and retroactively adapted for WCAG 2.1 – it is therefore always considered fulfilled.
Details can be found in WCAG 2.1 under Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing (external link).

Table: Robust 2024

Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
4.1.1 Parsing	0 %	100 %	0 %
4.1.3 Status Messages	80 %	13 %	7 %
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value	93 %	7 %	0 %

Monitoring result additional criteria from EN 301 549

In addition to the WCAG criteria, other criteria from the European standard EN 301 549 must also be reviewed as part of the monitoring. For apps, additional clauses from the following chapters of the standard are relevant:

Chapter 5 "Generic requirements"
Chapter 6 "ICT with two-way voice communication"
Chapter 7 "ICT with video capabilities"
Chapter 11 "Software"
Chapter 12 "Documentation and support services"

To a large extent, these criteria refer to special cases, such as two-way voice communication, real-time text or authoring tools. Therefore, these criteria are not applicable in many cases.

Generic requirements (Chapter 5)

Monitoring period

Generic requirements (Chapter 5) 2022
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
5.2 Activation of Accessibility Features	0 %	12 %	88 %
5.3 Biometrics	0 %	0 %	100 %
5.4 Preservation of Accessibility Information During Conversion	0 %	0 %	100 %
5.5.1 Means of Operation	41 %	12 %	47 %
5.5.2 Operable Parts Discernibility	53 %	18 %	29 %
5.6.1 Tactile or Auditory Status	0 %	12 %	88 %
5.6.2 Visual Status	0 %	12 %	88 %
5.7 Key Repeat 0%	0 %	12 %	88 %
5.8 Double Strike Key Acceptance	0 %	18 %	82 %
5.9 Simultaneous User Actions	6 %	18 %	76 %

Generic requirements (Chapter 5) 2023
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
5.2 Activation of Accessibility Features	0 %	7 %	93 %
5.3 Biometrics	0 %	0 %	100 %
5.4 Preservation of Accessibility Information During Conversion	0 %	0 %	100 %
5.5.1 Means of Operation	27 %	33 %	40 %
5.5.2 Operable Parts Discernibility	73 %	7 %	20 %
5.6.1 Tactile or Auditory Status	0 %	7 %	93 %
5.6.2 Visual Status	0 %	0 %	100 %
5.7 Key Repeat 0%	0 %	7 %	93 %
5.8 Double Strike Key Acceptance	0 %	13 %	87 %
5.9 Simultaneous User Actions	7 %	33 %	60 %

Generic requirements (Chapter 5) 2024
Criterion	Nor fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	No statement possible
5.2 Activation of Accessibility Features	7 %	20 %	73 %	0 %
5.3 Biometrics	0 %	20 %	80 %	0 %
5.4 Preservation of Accessibility Information During Conversion	0 %	0	100 %	0 %
5.5.1 Means of Operation	53 %	7 %	40 %	0 %
5.5.2 Operable Parts Discernibility	87 %	13 %	0 %	0 %
5.6.1 Tactile or Auditory Status	7 %	27 %	67 %	0 %
5.6.2 Visual Status	0 %	7 %	93 %	0 %
5.7 Key Repeat 0%	0 %	20 %	73 %	7 %
5.8 Double Strike Key Acceptance	0 %	20 %	67 %	13 %
5.9 Simultaneous User Actions	20 %	7 %	73 %	0 %

ICT with two-way voice communication (Chapter 6)

Monitoring period

ICT with two-way voice communication (Chapter 6) 2022
Criterion	Not applicable
6.1 Audio Bandwith for Speech	100 %
6.2.1.1 RTT Communication	100 %
6.2.1.2 Concurrent Voice and Text	100 %
6.2.2.1 Visually Distinguishable Display	100 %
6.2.2.2 Programmatically Determinable Send and Receive Direction	100 %
6.2.2.3 Speaker Identification	100 %
6.2.2.4 Visual Indicator of Audio with RTT	100 %
6.2.3a Interoperability Item A	100 %
6.2.3b Interoperability Item B	100 %
6.2.3c Interoperability Item C	100 %
6.2.3d Interoperability Item D	100 %
6.2.4 RTT Responsiveness	100 %
6.3 Caller ID	100 %
6.4 Alternatives to Voice Based Services	100 %
6.5.2 Resolution Item A	100 %
6.5.3 Frame Rate Item A	100 %
6.5.4 Synchronization between Audio and Video	100 %
6.5.5 Visual Indicator of Audio with Video	100 %
6.5.6 Speaker Identification with Video Communication	100 %

ICT with two-way voice communication (Chapter 6) 2023
Criterion	Not applicable
6.1 Audio Bandwith for Speech	100 %
6.2.1.1 RTT Communication	100 %
6.2.1.2 Concurrent Voice and Text	100 %
6.2.2.1 Visually Distinguishable Display	100 %
6.2.2.2 Programmatically Determinable Send and Receive Direction	100 %
6.2.2.3 Speaker Identification	100 %
6.2.2.4 Visual Indicator of Audio with RTT	100 %
6.2.3a Interoperability Item A	100 %
6.2.3b Interoperability Item B	100 %
6.2.3c Interoperability Item C	100 %
6.2.3d Interoperability Item D	100 %
6.2.4 RTT Responsiveness	100 %
6.3 Caller ID	100 %
6.4 Alternatives to Voice Based Services	100 %
6.5.2 Resolution Item A	100 %
6.5.3 Frame Rate Item A	100 %
6.5.4 Synchronization between Audio and Video	100 %
6.5.5 Visual Indicator of Audio with Video	100 %
6.5.6 Speaker Identification with Video Communication	100 %

ICT with two-way voice communication (Chapter 6) 2024
Criterion	Not applicable
6.1 Audio Bandwith for Speech	100 %
6.2.1.1 RTT Communication	100 %
6.2.1.2 Concurrent Voice and Text	100 %
6.2.2.1 Visually Distinguishable Display	100 %
6.2.2.2 Programmatically Determinable Send and Receive Direction	100 %
6.2.2.3 Speaker Identification	100 %
6.2.2.4 Visual Indicator of Audio with RTT	100 %
6.2.3a Interoperability Item A	100 %
6.2.3b Interoperability Item B	100 %
6.2.3c Interoperability Item C	100 %
6.2.3d Interoperability Item D	100 %
6.2.4 RTT Responsiveness	100 %
6.3 Caller ID	100 %
6.4 Alternatives to Voice Based Services	100 %
6.5.2 Resolution Item A	100 %
6.5.3 Frame Rate Item A	100 %
6.5.4 Synchronization between Audio and Video	100 %
6.5.5 Visual Indicator of Audio with Video	100 %
6.5.6 Speaker Identification with Video Communication	100 %

ICT with video capabilities (Chapter 7)

Monitoring period

ICT with video capabilities (Chapter 7) 2022
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
7.1.1 Captioning Playback	0 %	6 %	94 %
7.1.2 Captioning Synchronization	6 %	0 %	94 %
7.1.3 Preservation of Captioning	0 %	6 %	94 %
7.1.4 Captions Characteristics	0 %	6 %	94 %
7.1.5 Spoken Subtitles	0 %	6 %	94 %
7.2.1 Audio Description Playback	6 %	0 %	94 %
7.2.2 Audio Description Synchronization	6 %	0 %	94 %
7.2.3 Preservation of Audio Description	6 %	0 %	94 %
7.3 User Controls for Captions and Audio Description	0 %	0 %	100 %

ICT with video capabilities (Chapter 7) 2023
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
7.1.1 Captioning Playback	0 %	7 %	93 %
7.1.2 Captioning Synchronization	0 %	7 %	93 %
7.1.3 Preservation of Captioning	0 %	7 %	93 %
7.1.4 Captions Characteristics	0 %	7 %	93 %
7.1.5 Spoken Subtitles	0 %	0 %	100 %
7.2.1 Audio Description Playback	7 %	0 %	93 %
7.2.2 Audio Description Synchronization	0 %	0 %	100 %
7.2.3 Preservation of Audio Description	0 %	0 %	100 %
7.3 User Controls for Captions and Audio Description	0 %	0 %	100 %

ICT with video capabilities (Chapter 7) 2024
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	No statement possible
7.1.1 Captioning Playback	7 %	13 %	80 %	0 %
7.1.2 Captioning Synchronization	0 %	13 %	80 %	7 %
7.1.3 Preservation of Captioning	0 %	13 %	87 %	0 %
7.1.4 Captions Characteristics	7 %	13 %	80 %	0 %
7.1.5 Spoken Subtitles	0 %	7 %	93 %	0 %
7.2.1 Audio Description Playback	20 %	0 %	80 %	0 %
7.2.2 Audio Description Synchronization	7 %	0 %	93 %	0 %
7.2.3 Preservation of Audio Description	7 %	0 %	93 %	0 %
7.3 User Controls for Captions and Audio Description	0 %	7 %	93 %	0 %

Software (Chapter 11)

Monitoring period

Software (Chapter 11) 2022
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
11.1.1.1.2 Non-text content (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.2.1.2.1 Pre-recorded audio-only (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.2.1.2.2 Pre-recorded video-only (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100%
11.1.2.3.2 Audio description or media alternative (pre-recorded - closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.3.5.2 Identify input purpose (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.4.4.2 Resize text (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.4.5.2 Images of text (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.2.1.1.2 Keyboard (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.2.1.4.2 Character key shortcuts (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.3.1.1.2 Language of software (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.3.3.1.2 Error Identification (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.5.2.3 Use of accessibility services	0 %	65 %	35 %
11.5.2.5 Object information	59 %	29 %	12 %
11.5.2.6 Row, column, and headers	6 %	0 %	94 %
11.5.2.7 Values	29 %	41 %	29 %
11.5.2.8 Label relationships	47 %	18 %	35 %
11.5.2.9 Parent-child relationships	29 %	12 %	59 %
11.5.2.10 Text	24 %	53 %	24 %
11.5.2.11 List of available actions	24 %	24 %	53 %
11.5.2.12 Execution of available actions	18 %	53 %	29 %
11.5.2.13 Tracking of focus and selection attributes	18 %	65 %	18 %
11.5.2.14 Modification of focus and selection attributes	12 %	59 %	29 %
11.5.2.15 Change notification	29 %	18 %	53 %
11.5.2.16 Modifications of states and properties	12 %	35 %	53 %
11.5.2.17 Modifications of values and text	6 %	41 %	53 %
11.6.2 No disruption of accessibility features	24 %	29 %	47 %
11.7 User preferences	35 %	47 %	18 %
11.8.1 Content technology	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.2 Accessible content creation	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.3 Preservation of accessibility information in transformations	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.4 Repair assistance	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.5 Templates	0 %	0 %	100 %

Note: The assessment in the column "Not tested" results from the fact that these criteria were not checked in an app by mistake.

Software (Chapter 11) 2023
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	Not tested
11.1.1.1.2 Non-text content (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.1.2.1.2.1 Pre-recorded audio-only (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.1.2.1.2.2 Pre-recorded video-only (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.1.2.3.2 Audio description or media alternative (pre-recorded - closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.1.3.5.2 Identify input purpose (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.1.4.4.2 Resize text (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.1.4.5.2 Images of text (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.2.1.1.2 Keyboard (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.2.1.4.2 Character key shortcuts (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.3.1.1.2 Language of software (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.3.3.1.2 Error Identification (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %	0 %
11.5.2.3 Use of accessibility services	0 %	87 %	13 %	0 %
11.5.2.5 Object information	87 %	7 %	7 %	0 %
11.5.2.6 Row, column, and headers	0 %	7 %	93 %	0 %
11.5.2.7 Values	13 %	20 %	60 %	7 %
11.5.2.8 Label relationships	53 %	33 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.9 Parent-child relationships	7 %	80 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.10 Text	27 %	60 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.11 List of available actions	20 %	67 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.12 Execution of available actions	7 %	80 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.13 Tracking of focus and selection attributes	33 %	53 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.14 Modification of focus and selection attributes	7 %	80 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.15 Change notification	33 %	53 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.16 Modifications of states and properties	33 %	53 %	7 %	7 %
11.5.2.17 Modifications of values and text	0 %	87 %	7 %	7 %
11.6.2 No disruption of accessibility features	60 %	13 %	20 %	7 %
11.7 User preferences	67 %	20 %	7 %	7 %
11.8.1 Content technology	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %
11.8.2 Accessible content creation	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %
11.8.3 Preservation of accessibility information in transformations	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %
11.8.4 Repair assistance	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %
11.8.5 Templates	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %

Software (Chapter 11) 2024
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
11.1.1.1.2 Non-text content (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.2.1.2.1 Pre-recorded audio-only (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.2.1.2.2 Pre-recorded video-only (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.2.3.2 Audio description or media alternative (pre-recorded - closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.3.5.2 Identify input purpose (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.4.4.2 Resize text (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.1.4.5.2 Images of text (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.2.1.1.2 Keyboard (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.2.1.4.2 Character key shortcuts (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.3.1.1.2 Language of software (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.3.3.1.2 Error Identification (closed functionality)	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.5.2.3 Use of accessibility services	20 %	80 %	0 %
11.5.2.5 Object information	13 %	87 %	0 %
11.5.2.6 Row, column, and headers	13 %	73 %	13 %
11.5.2.7 Values	53 %	47 %	0 %
11.5.2.8 Label relationships	7 %	80 %	13 %
11.5.2.9 Parent-child relationships	67 %	33 %	0 %
11.5.2.10 Text	20 %	67 %	13 %
11.5.2.11 List of available actions	0 %	87 %	13 %
11.5.2.12 Execution of available actions	20 %	80 %	0 %
11.5.2.13 Tracking of focus and selection attributes	80 %	20 %	0 %
11.5.2.14 Modification of focus and selection attributes	20 %	7 %	73 %
11.5.2.15 Change notification	7 %	53 %	40 %
11.5.2.16 Modifications of states and properties	60 %	40 %	0 %
11.5.2.17 Modifications of values and text	33 %	60 %	7 %
11.6.2 No disruption of accessibility features	53 %	47 %	0 %
11.7 User preferences	60 %	40 %	0 %
11.8.1 Content technology	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.2 Accessible content creation	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.3 Preservation of accessibility information in transformations	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.4 Repair assistance	0 %	0 %	100 %
11.8.5 Templates	0 %	0 %	100 %

Document and support services (Chapter 12)

Monitoring period

Document and support services (Chapter 12) 2022
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
12.1.1 Accessibility and compatibility features	6 %	6 %	88 %
12.1.2 Accessible documentation	35 %	6 %	59 %
12.2.2 Information on accessibility and compatibility features	6 %	0 %	94 %
12.2.3 Effective communication	6 %	0 %	94 %
12.2.4 Accessible documentation	6 %	0 %	94 %

Note: The assessment in the column "Not tested" results from the fact that these criteria were not checked in an app by mistake.

Document and support services (Chapter 12) 2023
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable	Not tested
12.1.1 Accessibility and compatibility features	7 %	7 %	80 %	7 %
12.1.2 Accessible documentation	7 %	13 %	73 %	7 %
12.2.2 Information on accessibility and compatibility features	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %
12.2.3 Effective communication	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %
12.2.4 Accessible documentation	0 %	0 %	93 %	7 %

Document and support services (Chapter 12) 2024
Criterion	Not fulfilled	Fulfilled	Not applicable
12.1.1 Accessibility and compatibility features	7 %	7 %	87 %
12.1.2 Accessible documentation	7 %	13 %	80 %
12.2.2 Information on accessibility and compatibility features	0 %	0 %	100 %
12.2.3 Effective communication	0 %	0 %	100 %
12.2.4 Accessible documentation	0 %	7 %	93 %